User Tools

Site Tools


isaac_project:en:human_translation_instructions_v311:5_general_quality_guidelines

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

isaac_project:en:human_translation_instructions_v311:5_general_quality_guidelines [2023/11/15 15:43]
sergio created
isaac_project:en:human_translation_instructions_v311:5_general_quality_guidelines [2023/11/15 15:51] (current)
sergio
Line 1: Line 1:
 ==== GENERAL QUALITY GUIDELINES ==== ==== GENERAL QUALITY GUIDELINES ====
 +
 +__**CLIENT GOAL AND COST RECOVERY**__:​ 95% of error free content (no corrections ​
 +required). If any complaint about poor quality or rejection from the customer, a rework will be 
 +arranged. If the underperforming translator/​reviewer is asked to implement the changes ​
 +required by the customer by himself/​herself,​ the required fixing will be done for free. If the 
 +feedback implementation is assigned to another linguist, the affected wordcount/​additional ​
 +cost of the rework will be compensated and deducted from the PO of the underperforming ​
 +users. \\
 +
 +__**QA CHECKS**__: General and task-specific quality checks will be performed by the reviewers ​
 +and the Centific team before, during, and after the delivery to the customer. This is to 
 +monitor the general translation/​review quality and to identify cheaters or poor performers. No 
 +matter in which stage of the process issues are detected, QA and anti-fraud protocols will 
 +apply to all users (reviewers included). \\
 +
 +__**PROTOCOL FOR MANAGING PERFORMANCE**__
 +
 +
 +{{ :​isaac_project:​en:​human_translation_instructions_v311:​isaac_project_en_human_translation_instructions_general_quality_guidelines_img1.jpg?​600 |}}
 +
 +If any reviewer unfairly penalizes any translator by applying any error category improperly, ​
 +the penalization will be removed from the translator performance report and applied to the 
 +reviewer himself/​herself. \\
 +__**QUALITY GROUPS**__: According to each translator global quality score, there will be 3 
 +different Quality groups: \\
 +• Gold: global quality score >=95% \\
 +• Silver: global quality score between 80 - 94.99% \\
 +• Bronze: global quality score between 70% - 79.99% \\
 +Additionally:​ \\
 +• Bronze users could be temporarily deactivated for further quality checks and 
 +assessments. \\
 +• Users with less than 70% of global quality score will be removed from the pool for 
 +poor quality performance. \\
 +• Users with negative scores (below 0%) will be considered cheaters and the below 
 +anti-fraud protocol will apply. \\
 +• Gold suppliers will have higher priority during job assignments over the rest. \\
 +• Reviewers with a global quality score lower than 90% in Review webapps will be 
 +removed from the review pool for poor quality performance. ​ \\
 +This is a general framework, and it is for reference only. Centific is free to adapt and adjust it 
 +at any time depending on customer specific requests and project specific needs. For 
 +extraordinary circumstances or other scenarios not explicitly mentioned here, Centific is free 
 +to apply any necessary quality management strategy (including user removal, user 
 +deactivation,​ and PO discounts) depending on the case. \\
 +
 +NEXT TOPIC => [[isaac_project:​en:​human_translation_instructions_v311:​6_quality_criteria|QUALITY CRITERIA]]
 +
 +
 +
isaac_project/en/human_translation_instructions_v311/5_general_quality_guidelines.1700063030.txt.gz · Last modified: 2023/11/15 15:43 by sergio